|
September 22, 2003
Tim Predmore, a serving US soldier, calls for the end of an occupation based on lies.
For the past six months I have participated in what I believe to be the great modern lie: Operation Iraqi Freedom.
After the horrific events of September 11, 2001, and throughout the battle in Afghanistan, the groundwork was being laid for the invasion of Iraq. "Shock and awe" was the term used to describe the display of power the world was to view upon the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom. It was to be a dramatic show of strength and advanced technology from within the arsenals of the American and British militaries.
But as a soldier preparing to take part in the invasion of Iraq, the words "shock and awe" rang deep within my psyche. Even as we prepared to depart, it seemed that these two great superpowers were about to break the very rules they demanded that others obey.
Without the consent of the United Nations, and ignoring the pleas of their own citizens, the United States and Britain invaded Iraq. "Shock and awe"? Yes, the words correctly described the emotional impact I felt as we embarked on an act not of justice but of hypocrisy.
From the moment the first shot was fired in this so-called war of liberation and freedom, hypocrisy reigned. After the broadcasting of recorded images of captured and dead US soldiers over Arab television, American and British leaders vowed revenge while verbally assaulting the networks for displaying such vivid images.
Yet within hours of the deaths of Saddam Hussein's two sons, the US released horrific photographs of the two dead brothers for the world to view.
As soldiers serving in Iraq, we have been told that our purpose here is to help the people of Iraq by providing them with the necessary assistance militarily as well as in humanitarian efforts. Then tell me where the humanity was in the recent Stars and Stripes (the newspaper of the US military) account of two children taken to a US military camp by their mother, in search of medical care. The children had been unknowingly playing with explosive ordnance they had found and as a result were severely burned. The account tells how they, after an hour-long wait, were denied care by two US military doctors.
So then, what is our purpose here? Was this invasion because of weapons of mass destruction, as we so often have heard? If so, where are they? Did we invade to dispose of a leader and his regime because they were closely associated with Osama bin Laden? If so, where is the proof? Or is it that our incursion is a result of our own economic advantage? Iraq's oil can be refined at the lowest cost of any in the world. Coincidence?
This looks like a modern-day crusade not to free an oppressed people or to rid the world of a demonic dictator relentless in his pursuit of conquest and domination but a crusade to control another nation's natural resource.
There is only one truth: Americans are dying. There are 10 to 14 attacks on our servicemen and women daily in Iraq.
I once believed that I served for a cause: "To uphold and defend the constitution of the United States." Now I no longer believe that; I have lost my conviction. I can no longer justify my service for what I believe to be half-truths and bold lies.
With age comes wisdom, and at 36 years old I am no longer so blindly led as to believe without question.
We have all faced death in Iraq without reason or justification. How many more must die? How many more tears must be shed before Americans awake and demand the return of the men and women whose job it is to protect them rather than their leader's interest?
Tim Predmore is on active duty with the US 101st Airborne Division near Mosul, Iraq.
A version of this article appeared in the Peoria Journal Star, Illinois.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/09/21/1064082860635.html
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |