Greetings,

Here is an something from one of Selassie I speeches that gives the answer:

---------------------------------------
To be neutral is to be impartial, impartial to judge actions and policies objectively, as we see them either contributing to or detracting from the resolution of the world's problems, the preservation of peace and the improvement of the general level of man's living conditions. Thus, we may find ourselves now opposing, now supporting. now voting with, now voting against, first the East, next the West. It is the worth of the policies themselves, and not their source or sponsor, which determines the position of one who is truly neutral.

This, We maintain, is the essence of non-alignment. Those who would righteously denounce one side on every major problem or issue while reserving nothing but praise for the other cannot claim to be non-aligned, nor can those whose policies are shaped for them elsewhere and who wait patiently to be instructed whether they are to be for or against be called uncommitted.

Words of RasTafarI
---------------------------------------------

So RasTafarI spoke good for the good things that the Pope, and catholic church has done. RasTafarI deals with truth and rights, so he won't speak against a good work done by a person or organization that has done bad things. He will see the good as good and the bad as bad.

Ark I
RasTafarI
Haile Selassie I