peace and hotep,

General Nyabinghi.

would you consider Paul a 'new testament' patriarch?

in Civilization and Barbarism, Diop discussed patriarchal and matriarchal societies.

however, you did not discuss Diop (who co-related the Hyksos/Hebrew invasion) when you asked:

**You are familar with the works of Dr. Chek Diop, correct? As I stated before, even if you wanted to debate about Joseph, you clearly can not tell me, that When Moses was a prince in Egypt, that the Pharoh at that time was a Hyksos? If so, then in your estimation, exactly how long were the Hyksos on the throne? And if you claim that Joseph was serving a Hyksos King, then when was the invasion, that predated the famine in the region?

although, i noted before that the Hyksos/Hebrews occupied Egypt/Kemit for 200 years which prohibits the foretold 400 year captivity by Abraham.

yes, General Nyabinghi, 400 years is the point and when you suggest that the 400 years is not the point:

"***That is not the point. I was speaking of chosenism, and not the length of time spent in Egypt. The history channel gives it 200 years. Tomoto/tomato? The point is that they were there. As I also stated earlier, there are huge gaps in Egyptian history, especially the Kemetian history."

then rhetoric become revisionism...... remember that you mentioned the conditions of the prophesy:

"*** Once again the article is in eror. That had nothing to do with their "choseness". Their struggle in Egypt was told to Abraham by Jah that his people will serve in a foriegn land for 400 years. This was LONG before Moses was even on the scene. Their being in Egypt had nothing to do with prompting Jah. Jah is the one who put them there. "

also, when you state:

"*I would disagree, Africa has more Arabic invasions than any other ethnicity.",

what is an 'arab'.

for Arabs are the most recent of all Semitic peoples according to their appearance in history. in fact, it is not possible to speak about Arabs in ancient times.

General Nyabinghi, forgive me, if it seemed to you that i suggested that moving caused one to loose pigmentation:

"***Yes, but one does not gain Melanin, or loose it by simply moving. You have white people who have lived in Africa for hundreds of years and have not become black yet. You have black people living up in Alaska, and started an entire civilization up there, and have not become white yet. You do not loose your melanin, or gain melanin. Melanin is genetic."

but i never referred to the Hyksos coalition as 'white' ......did i?

so this response is not really necessary of you, is it?:

"Joseph's brothers would have been able to tell the difference between a white boy with a tan and a real Kememetian.
Hebrews and Egyptians looked similar.
"Yeshua/Jesus went to Egypt to hide. How can that be possible with blonde hair and blue eyes?

1500 year elapsed between the time of the Hyksos/Joseph and Yeshua/Jesus.

freedomisahapisalve